iPhone? Tricorder? What is i...

July 22, 2011

I did a post a few months ago about Star Trek technology, including the tricorder hand-held, do-anything gadget.

Well…I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again—we’re heading steadily and inexorably towards Star Trek technology, especially with mobile computing devices.

According to SlashGear, a team of Northeastern University researchers is working on modifying a smartphone to be a kind of medical tricorder like “Bones” and the other doctors always had on Star Trek.

Actually, it’s fascinating stuff. Here’s the idea—

A diabetic has special nanoparticles injected just under their skin. The particles aren’t visible, but they fluoresce when they touch glucose (this can also work for sodium and maybe all kinds of things in the blood).

The diabetic uses a modified smartphone (the researchers are trying it with an iPhone at the moment) to read the fluorescence to determine glucose levels.

I’m sorry, but that’s “pretty cool,” to quote Saturday Night Live’s Vanessa Bayer doing Miley Cyrus.

Imagine how psyched diabetics will be if this thing becomes a reality. No more needles.

And beyond diabetics, what if the technology can expand to other types of detection? Cancer? I mean, that would be amazing.

It’s a creative use of a new technology—nanotechnology, which could transform virtually every technology on the planet (I guess I need to throw “and beyond” in there for the Trekkies)—with a common every day item: the phone.

But I’ve said this before, too. The phone isn’t just the phone anymore. A lot of things aren’t what they were before—they’re a lot more now.

Because we’re moving towards combining all kinds of technologies into useful, mobile gadgets. iPhones are also iPods. Tablets are also phones. Et cetera, et cetera. It’s just the way we’re going.

“Pretty cool” though, huh?

Star Trek post if you’re interested…

-

4

-

Apple Store: Real or Fake?

July 21, 2011

The Internet is abuzz today with the news that fake Apple stores are being discovered all over China.  While China is a known hotbed for fake and counterfeit products, the newly found faux Apple stores are taking things to a whole new level.  Not only has this imitation store ripped off the Apple products, but they have gone so far as to replicate the entire Apple experience.

From the wooden shelves and the sparse set up to the “Apple” employees wearing the telltale Apple blue shirt, visitors at this store would be hard-pressed to spot the differences between the fake and the real Apple.  According to edibleapple.com, some of the workers actually believe that they are employed by an official Apple retail outlet.  Almost every aspect of these sham stores seem to replicate the true “Apple” experience.

As noted at edibleapple.com, “a huge portion of Apple’s record-breaking revenue recorded during the past quarter originated in China.”  Shockingly, Apple only has a few stores in Beijing and Shanghai.  Per NPR, reporters from the BirdAbroad blog visiting the store noticed subtle differences in both the aesthetic quality of the stores and the service customers receive at said stores.

The technology might not be technically stolen. According to NPR “a store employee reached by phone has confirmed that the store is not an authorized Apple reseller.  The salesman said products in the store are genuine Apple products sold at the same price as those advertised on Apple’s website. But everything from the branding to the concept was, which begs the question: Is this the newest technology threat?

Apple is one of the most popular, widely recognized, technically lauded brands in the world.  If their product design and branding can be ripped off and resold, what tech company is safe? While it is widely acknowledged that China isn’t recognized for their adherence to intellectual property law, this is one of, if not the most, flagrant examples of brand commandeering in recent memory.

This threat does not only affect Apple, but myriad other technologies and companies.  So how do companies attempt to safeguard from this type of product pilfering?  In-store product registration at the time of purchase (either on the Internet or at the store) enables stores to track and monitor their inventory.  Additionally, a product can only be registered once, so any duplicate or triplicate registrations can be easily noted.

While product tracking is a huge factor in monitoring and controlling products and, to some extent, branding, no brand is 100 percent secure from product replication and theft.  For the most part, countries adhere to pre-established international property laws.  For those that don’t, product tracking and registration is any tech company’s best bet to regulate the distribution of their products in international markets.

-

6

-

Irony of Google+ Mobile

July 21, 2011

I’ve written a few things lately about the Android-iPhone war and wasn’t planning on doing it again today. But this I can’t resist…

Google just released a Google+ app for the iPhone market. Even though not everyone with Androids can necessarily use it (first time, anyway).

In case you haven’t heard about Google+ yet, it’s Google’s latest response to Facebook—a social networking site that’s invitation-only and has a “slick interface” and subtle improvements on Facebook, according to PCWorld.

While some people aren’t too excited about another social networking experiment from Google, others think it could boost the company’s value and give Facebook a real run for its money.

That alone is kind of funny to me just because it’s Google (creators of Android) making stuff for Apple. It’s not like haha funny because it’s just business and makes perfect sense, but you know.

This I actually think is a touch haha funny—or maybe like hehe funny or tch-tch funny—you know, a titter…This is what it said for Google+ on the Android market when I looked on my phone—

“Google+ (Google Plus) is still in active development and not yet available to everyone. You need an invitation to sign in.”

Google just means the website is kind of still in beta. And (obviously for an invitation-only site) you need an invitation to sign in. When you join, there’s a disclaimer that says things might be a little buggy.

But it kinda makes it sound like you may not be able to use it. So Android phone owners could literally hear that Google just released a Google+ app for the iPhone, go to the Android Market and think that they can’t use the app…although they could if they had an iPhone.

And they might be right. Here’s the message I got when I tried to sign into Google+ on my Android the first time:

“Right now, we’re testing with a small number of people, but it won’t be long before the Google+ project is ready for everyone. Already invited? We’ve temporarily exceeded our capacity. Please try again soon.”

I immediately asked an iPhone user if they could sign in. They downloaded Google+ and signed into their account first time.

Irony.

I tried again and could sign in on the second try, but still.

And here’s more irony…According to the International Business Times, Google+ for iPhone is the most popular app in the iPhone market right now. Yet it’s only the eighth most popular app on the Android Market. Not sure what’s up with that, but it’s ironic.

Despite these little things, however, Google+ has gotten good reviews—the video chat functionality is killer, for one. And I actually respect Google’s honesty about potential bugs and stuff.

So, regardless of a couple little things, it’s been wildly popular so far. Which, actually, may account for the inaccessibility the first time I tried to sign in.

-

4

-

Is IVR still relevant?

July 20, 2011

The Internet. Text messages.  Satellite transmissions.  Instant messaging. Smartphones.  Emails.  Tablet computers.  Over the last decade, there have been incredible strides made in the world of communications technology.

Traditional landline telephones were once a communication staple in every home and business, and on every street corner.  In recent years, there has been a shift in the popularity of communication devices, and the telephone has seen an extreme decrease in the amount of customers utilizing landline services.

This marked decrease in landline phone usage can understandably lead to questions about the continued relevance and validity of interactive voice response (IVR) systems and applications.  The introduction of the previously mentioned technologies has drastically changed the way in which communication occurs.  It’s valid to wonder whether IVR systems will continue to be an important component of telecommunications systems; after all, the word voice is sandwiched into the title.

There are myriad industries that utilize IVR as all or part of their communications technology.  From voice-activated dialing to private branch exchanges, IVRs can automate routine communications.  Companies in the mobile, banking, entertainment, travel, public utilities and news industries might use IVR to enable customers to check balances, make payments, place orders, make reservations, book tickets and check on account status.

IVR systems are more important today than they were ten or 15 years ago.  This advance in technology has not muted the importance of high-level IVR solutions, but rather this technology has contributed to the advancement of IVR technology.  According to Speech Technology Magazine, the global IVR market is expected to grow to $1.9 billion dollars a year by 2015.

As opposed to just existing as a telecommunications solution that relies exclusively on the phone to operate, interactive voice response is instead fast becoming a unified communication technology. IVR systems and hosting capabilities are integrating with real-time communication services like instant messaging, VoIP, call control, data sharing and speech recognition. This move to a unified communications platform is a significant leap forward for the IVR industry and will guarantee its relevancy indefinitely.  If businesses can use their IVRs in tandem or even in place of other technologies, it streamlines operations, cuts down costs and makes integration much easier.

Over the course of the past ten years, great strides have been made in the realm of enterprise telephony, only serving to improve and increase the services IVRs can perform.  The IVR industry is extremely robust, with a variety of different companies adopting IVRs daily to meet their telecommunications and unified communications needs.

-

6

-

Android vs. iPhone War: Ente...

July 20, 2011

The iPhone came out and everyone went batty over it. People were addicted. They forgot how to communicate without their iPhone in their hand.

“I’ll MapQuest it on my iPhone.”

“I’ll Google it on my iPhone.”

“I’ll look to see if there’s an app for that on my iPhone.”

You know. Some of you even did it yourselves.

By the time Androids came on the scene, we were all accustomed to smartphones, but people still went batty from the cool Droid commercials and the cute little green android. And the fact that they were the anti-iPhones. Androids were suddenly the cool phones to have and iPhones somehow cliché or something, I don’t know.

“Yeah, I’ve got a Droid. It’s awesome.”

(Said with one part rebel cool and another part insecure defiance.)

Android soared in popularity throughout 2010. According to Canalys, Android sales grew 88 percent from the last quarter of 2009 to the last quarter of 2010. Androids overtook the top spot in the smartphone market earlier this year (from BlackBerry, actually).

The new ChangeWave Research survey all the bloggers are talking about right now reported that 46 percent of consumers planning to buy a smartphone in the next 90 days prefer Apple’s iOS—to 32 percent for the Android OS. (BlackBerry RIM OS was at 4 percent, by the way.)

So at this precise moment in time consumers may be leaning towards Apple iOS over Google Android. Actually, Android has yet to overtake Apple iOS according to ChangeWave—it bolted up from 3 percent in June 2009 to 37 percent in September 2010, but Apple was still at 38 percent then.

Android has actually dipped in 2011 while Apple iOS has risen. Which may have something to do with the iCloud—a data-sync and storage service Apple is releasing with iOS 5 in the fall. Or it could just be this year’s trend.

In any case, it’s been a tight battle since Androids started challenging iPhones. It’s taken place entirely on the consumer front. And it’s been fought almost entirely on cool factor.

However, cool factor doesn’t really fly on the enterprise front. Businesses are much more interested in functionality and integration with Microsoft Exchange and other business software.

But businesses are also definitely starting to turn to Androids and iPhones. (Maybe out of sheer exasperation with employees begging for them.)

I think enterprise will be the new front in the Android-iPhone war and possibly a decisive one. And I think cool will quickly go out the window.

Currently, enterprise is BlackBerry turf. Why? Because they work. They’re not cool (sorry, BlackBerry, you used to be the cool kid on the block), but they work.

On the enterprise front, if it doesn’t work, it won’t fly. So we’ll see what happens.

-

4

-

Top UC and Telco Trends

July 20, 2011

As mentioned in a previous blog post, the telecommunications industry is one of the only industries to experience growth during the recession.  According to a report by Searchtelecom: “In the midst of widespread economic turmoil, global telecommunications revenue is projected to increase from roughly $1.7 trillion in 2008 to more than $2.7 trillion in 2013.”[1]

Unified communications typically work in tandem with telecommunications in order to diversify technological capabilities and allow for real-time communication beyond the telephone.  Businesses typically rely on a combination of both telco and unified communications for business interactions.  It makes sense then that both industries would show significant growth in the years ahead.  Whether we pick up a telephone, use the Internet, send a text or instant message, or even turn on the television, we are utilizing communication technology in some very critical way on a daily basis.

There are several very interesting, important trends occurring in both the telco and UC space.  Both technologies are continually evolving, and while it may be somewhat difficult to keep pace with every technical development that springs up, there are several overarching trends that are indicative of the direction communications tech is going.

As a kick-off to communications week, it is important to highlight the top trends in both unified communications and telecommunications.

1) The cloud: Everyone who comes into contact with technology, from seasoned professionals to those dabbling in tech on their off time, have heard about the ubiquitous cloud for the last several years.  Debates over the cloud’s security, functionality and evolution have been hotly debated topics on many parts of the Internet, and cloud computing along with a multiple server interface will continue to dominate both technology and conversations for the foreseeable future.

While there are a multitude of reasons why the cloud’s popularity has caught on so rapidly, some of the easiest explanations continue to be cost convenience and space.  Consumers moving their data to the cloud can access their information at anytime, anywhere.  Instead of having to lug around burdensome hard drives and other data storage items, they can hop onto any computer with Internet access, anywhere in the world with the proper security information and have instantaneous access to their data.

Because customers don’t have to worry about setting up a communications infrastructure onsite, they can save money using cloud programs.  Someone need not be available 24/7 to maintain a physical system; anyone can simply access their data on the Internet without knowledge of servers, hardware or infrastructure.

2) SAAS: In tandem with the cloud, software-as-a-service (SaaS) is changing the way software is both used and stored.  Instead of having to purchase and tediously upload software from a CD-ROM onto a driver, users can simply purchase a program from a website and download it, and the associated data will be stored in the cloud.  SaaS has become the preferred delivery method for software, and the industry is rapidly growing with sales being projected by Gartner to reach $10.7 billion dollars in 2011.

3) Mobile application integration: From non-crucial applications to business critical programs the new trend in tech development is offering program accessibility through mobile applications.  In recent years, smartphone usage has increased exponentially.  In order to cater to this broad demographic, software engineers and programmers are developing applications for any and every product that can be accessed by webOS, iOS, Android, Blackberry, Symbian OS, and Windows Mobile.  This is a quickly developing industry and will inevitably be an integral part of the telco and UC process for years to come.

4) Multimodal tools and convergence.  All the aforementioned tools offer users distinct vehicles through which to consume technology, but unified communications allows for multimodal integration.  Now and increasingly in the future, users will be able to use software, applications and programs via their mobile phones, land lines, SMS, computers, netbooks, laptops, iPads, Nooks and any other device that allows for any type of communication.  It is vital that companies working in the development sphere make their programs accessible to multiple devices in a myriad of ways.  Multimodal software will dominate the future of tech, and unified communication and telecommunications is no exception.

[1] Keith Kessinger, “Telecom Revenue Will Grow despite Recession, Study Says,” Telecom Information, News and Tips - SearchTelecom.com, section goes here, accessed July 19, 2011, http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/news/

-

6

-

“It’s a phone too.”

July 19, 2011

Stocks for telecommunications companies are on the rise with all the new-fangled gadgets out there—cell phones, smartphones, tablets. And there’s no reason to think they won’t continue to rise.

The thing about telephones is that they’re not really telephones anymore. Sure, your parents might still have something on a side table somewhere that’s a phone and just a phone (probably right next to the cassette-tape answering machine).

But the lines between functionality are blurring so that new technologies are incorporating telecom into everything.

Look at cell phones. Even the basic run-of-the-mill ones now have Internet capability. Smartphones have all kinds of functionality. But that’s looking at it from the phone-with-extras point of view.

The whatever-with-phone point of view now includes tablets, which was a natural progression. If you include VoIP, then pocket PCs, netbooks, laptops and desktops all have telecom capabilities.

The fact is that telecom is a global driver now with the recent inundation of new gadgets, and stock performance illustrates that. There’s been a lot written in the financial media lately about how well the telecom companies are doing.

Investment research firm Zacks points to telecom as one of the only industries to experience technological advances during the recession, leading to evolution, increased competition and growth in the industry as a whole.

The Financial Times picked telecoms as leaders in returns and dividends:

“AT&T is yielding 5.5 per cent, Deutsche Telekom [Germany] 6.6 per cent, and Telefónica [Spain] 6.7 per cent. Add these dividends on top of recent price gains and the total returns of many telecoms over the past year look stunning.”

MSN had this to say:

“But one of the most striking developments in the world of income investing is taking place in a much more familiar sector: telephone stocks.”

At this point, phone-in-everything is a relatively new phenomenon. But it should grow. Think about it. If you’re gonna carry a gadget around, you might as well have a phone in it. Right?

-

4

-

A Brief History of Comm

July 19, 2011

Unified communications (the multimodal technologies that power communication devices) and telecommunications (communication that occurs over a cable, telephone or other electronic device) are an integral part of everyday business transmissions.

Regardless of what industry or sphere a business is operating in, it relies at least marginally on some type of communications technology to maintain daily business operation both internally and externally.  Employees need to communicate with prospective clients, customers and each other to complete routine tasks and projects.

Companies typically have Telco infrastructure, unified communications technology or, more often than not, both in place to ensure that successful contact is made and maintained on a day-to-day basis.

Telecommunications have evolved from less efficient forms of communication like telegraphs and audio messages to telephones, microwave signals and fiber optic transmissions that can reach individuals on the other side of the world in a matter of seconds.  The first telegraph office opened in the U.S. in 1844.  The first transatlantic telegraph cable was laid in 1866 (according to telephonetribute.com message exchanges between the United States and Europe took eleven days before the telegraph line was established).  Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone in 1876.

More recently, the first cell phone service became available in 1981 in both Saudi Arabia and Scandinavia.  The first domain, Symbolics.com, was assigned in March of 1985, foreshadowing the Internet age.  In 1992 the World Wide Web was born.

The growth of the Internet over the last 20 years has been an omnipresent force in all communications technology.  VoIP technology enables users to make calls via data transmission over the Internet.  APIs enable software programs to communicate with one another.  SIP enables control of both voice and video calls over the Internet.

Unified communications have also rapidly advanced in tandem with the swift evolution of technology and the telecommunications industry.  Many components of unified communications require the development of support systems that function to optimize technology and streamline communication processes.

From PBX systems to instant and unified messaging, unified communications serve to integrate and combine multiple technologies into a single structure to consolidate and improve the efficiency of communication systems.

Plum Voice has been recently featured on Alltop’s Unified Communications blog. Multimodal communications are becoming increasingly essential to business exchanges of all types, as one can see from taking a look at any of the blogs within Alltop’s Unified Communications category.  This week we will be exploring new and emerging trends in the telecommunications and unified communications space.

-

6

-

Smartphone Viruses—War!

July 18, 2011

When I first got my smartphone I asked about virus threats. The guy at the store told me it wasn’t a big concern yet because hackers hadn’t turned their full attention onto smartphones yet.

I downloaded virus protection anyway—one that he suggested—and felt fairly safe doing my banking and whatever else with my phone. Now I’m not so sure.

In March Google had to remove at least 50 malicious apps from the Android Market. They’d been hacked and infected with malware.

When I bought my phone the guy also said that the few viruses that were out at the time were fairly harmless. They just did annoying little things like opening pop-up adds every time you brought up your browser.

It looks like things have changed somewhat. In March, Google’s Rich Cannings told the Los Angeles Times that the malware Google found was still limited but was accessing device-specific codes “which are used to identify mobile devices” and the version of Android the phone is using.

“But given the nature of the exploits, the attacker(s) could access other data…”

I beg your pardon? “Access other data?” Yeah, that concerns me.

The Telegraph reported just today that one of the Google Android viruses could bypass your phone’s security to quietly send premium-rate text messages to a phone number set up by the hackers, who would collect the charges.

There’s nothing harmless about that little trick. And don’t think I’m picking on Android (I have one and love it). Apple has its own share of troubles with viruses on the iPhone. Supposedly, most of the viruses out there still operate on the Nokia Symbian operating system, but the fact is that Apple and Android own the market and hackers follow the market.

In fact, the Telegraph also reported that viruses for Android and Apple rose 46 percent last year.

You know what all this tells me? That the virus war has begun on the smartphone front.

So I still have the antivirus on my phone. But I’m still uncertain about banking and stuff. It’s a war—there’s no telling which side could be winning at any given moment.

-

4

-

Nanotechnology in Retail

July 15, 2011

Whether we realize it or not, nanotechnology is growing in retail, showing up in products like food and food storage and surface treatments.

Nanotechnology is the manipulation of matter at the nano scale to make new things, such as new materials. Actually, to go more into it than that probably only makes it more confusing. It involves quantum mechanical effects at the atomic and molecular level.

If you check out Nanoshop.com, you can see some of the things people are making using nanotechnology. They include hydrophobic treatments for glass, environmentally friendly metal cleaners and treatment for concrete that prevents moss and algae growth.

Evidently silver nanoparticles are a common nano material because of their antimicrobial properties. They’re found most often in food storage containers to extend product shelf-life.

According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN), there are about 1,300 consumer products with nanotechnology out there and could be as many as 3,400 by 2020. The products come from over 30 countries, including the U.S. and China.

It’s not always evident that products contain nanoparticles by the packaging because some retailers are hesitant to acknowledge they contain such materials. Nanotechnology is still an emerging technology that most people don’t understand, which makes them wary.

However, a report by the Food Standards Authority indicates that the public perception of nanotechnology in food is at least “not negative,” according to PEN.

NANO Magazine ran an editorial that actually pointed to nanotechnology as a way for food companies to distinguish their products. (I guess kind of like organic.) And that most nanoparticles have yet to show any signs of threat.

“Many of the problems surrounding nano in food can be said to relate to fear and ignorance,” the editorial stated.

Well, in any case, nanoparticles are beginning their journey into the retail scene. Most experts feel nanotechnology’s impact will go far beyond that. It could be as big as the Industrial or Computer Revolutions. We’ll see.

-

4

-