Automated Voice Therapy

February 21, 2012

Interactive voice response (IVR) systems are useful tools for healthcare providers. They help doctors’ offices remind patients about appointments, yearly checkups and the like.

IVR is also proving to be a useful tool for patients as well, both in treatment and outside of treatment. At Plum, we’ve already seen it applied to smoking cessation efforts, for example.

A study by researchers from the University of Vermont, Duke University Medical School and University of Vermont College of Medicine has shown that IVR systems can work for patients with chronic pain after they complete their therapy.

Research shows that group cognitive-behavioral therapy can help patients with chronic, untreatable pain to cope with their pain and the stress associated with it to improve their daily functioning.

But what happens when patients leave their treatment? It can be hard for them to keep up with the skills learned in group therapy when going from “initially learning skills, while working with a therapist and with considerable group support, to mastering and maintaining those skills on one’s own…”

In their study—Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response for Chronic Pain Reduction and Relapse Prevention—the researchers from Duke and Vermont added IVR to treatment of 26 subjects.

The treatment included a four-part IVR element with “a daily self-monitoring questionnaire, a [teaching] review of coping skills, pre-recorded behavioral rehearsals of coping skills, and monthly personalized feedback messages from the [cognitive behavioral] therapist based on a review of the patient’s daily reports.”

The researchers found that therapeutic IVR treatment greatly helped all 26 subjects after they left their therapy, both in strengthening their coping skills in the short term (4-month follow-up) and maintaining those skills in the longer term (8-month follow-up).

“We believe that if our findings are replicable,” the researchers wrote. “Then using the [therapeutic IVR] as a coping skill consolidation and relapse prevention program could be an efficacious and cost-effective addition to any health care program.”

-

4

-

Dear Media: Be Objective

February 21, 2012

Much of what’s out there as news today is uninformed, rhetorical and biased. And the blog posts and the comments attached to those blog posts are downright alarming.

Although I don’t entirely blame the bloggers or the commenters. They’re only following the line of the media they read. Except for the obvious cranks, bigots, haters, et cetera.

First of all, what happened to the media just reporting the facts objectively? Didn’t they used to do that, or am I just being naïve? I thought they did, years ago. I thought the media’s entire purpose was to report on the world how it actually is—to show us what’s really happening out there, to ferret out injustices, et cetera.

Silly me, I thought the mission of the media was to discover and tell the truth. At least that’s how I went about it when I was a reporter. But there again, maybe I was just being naïve.

Times have changed, just in the last few years it seems. The media have found themselves fighting for survival, competing against Jersey Shore and Keeping Up with the Kardashians for our attention. And I don’t just mean the tabloids.

To survive, the mainstream media have, in many cases, resorted to catering to an audience for readership/viewership. They’ve become editorial, opinionated. They pick and choose their data to suit their needs, et cetera.

Yet they still report their stories as whole truths, which makes them dangerous.

If someone reads a trusted news source, they’ll believe what they read, whether it’s true or not. And if millions of people read it, millions of people will walk around misinformed.

With misguided news agencies as their examples, it’s not surprising that many bloggers go astray. If a respected news agency slants a story, they will too. But they influence even more readers.

And some of these readers commenting on news stories and blog posts today go even further—they’re shockingly ignorant.

But with misguided bloggers and misguided news agencies giving legitimacy to their uninformed views, it’s not surprising that commenters say what they say. Disappointing, but not surprising.

-

4

-